Single Review: Spencer Kilpatrick, “Lungs”

Fans of early Amos Lee – in other words: well-crafted acoustic soul – mustmustMUST tune into Spencer Kilpatrick, a Reno, Nev.-based songwriter who previewed the single “Lungs” on Soundcloud just this week. Like Lee, Kilpatrick – who’s getting primed to tour nationally, starting tomorrow – has an in indescribably smooth and endearing timbre, something transient and touching between smoke and silk. And while “Dear Carolyn,” the single he self-released last month, hinted at a command of rhythm in its bluesy lament, “Lungs” outdoes it and then some, resolutely overflowing with the effects of time and a wounded soul.

“Keep a close eye on me in the deep water / Fill my arms with the blame,” he moans. “Breathing ain’t that easy when you’re trying to keep the heat off you / Fill my lungs with your name.” This is powerful stuff, not the type of thin-willed folk you often hear from blues-based singer-songwriters just cutting their solo-career milk-teeth. Kilpatrick’s voice is a heartbroken vessel and it is uniquely matched with the mastery of his craft he displays.

On his Bandcamp page, Kilpatrick pays homage to the lyrics of Joan and The Rivers’ Eric Smith – that band, too, has a new release — and El Camino Sutra’s Keith Damron; his work fits alongside both well, taking the minute details and making them emblematic. And, while Kilpatrick’s work with garage-soul trio Failure Machine (I’m thinking mostly of Elko) is fairly amped-up and colorful, his work here is much smaller, more intimate, almost hushed. But nothing is lost in the translation.

There’s not a lot one can say about one-off, one-song singles but, if “Lungs” is any indication of his future solo efforts, take note now: you’re going to want to keep an eye on this guy.

Exit Lines: Harry Potter on Broadway

The Lyric, former home to Broadway’s most expensive musical (the infamous Spider-Man: Turn Off the Dark), now houses Broadway’s most expensive play. But Harry Potter and the Cursed Child, all two parts and six-ish hours of it, should be there for a more extended stay. My nine-year-old daughter and I recently made a day of it, and it lived up to its advanced billing, captivating even this Muggle-ish critic.

I haven’t really done the work with Harry Potter. Oh, I’ve seen all the movies (a chore after the fourth or so) and we enjoyed the theme park at Universal Studios Florida last summer. (The theming is impeccable, and the main ride a true jaw-dropper.) But Larissa has read all the books and the published script to the play (written by Jack Thorne, from an original story by director John Tiffany and magister J.K. Rowling), owns some of the merch, steeped herself in the park with her mom while I rested outside its gates, and knows the best of the films by heart. I was glad to have her, as she explained some of the finer points of the HPU (Harry Potter Universe) to me. (The Showbill has a helpful glossary and guide, though it’s hard to imagine anyone wanting to make this commitment without some foreknowledge.)

In layman terms, Cursed Child is to Harry Potter what Back to the Future Part II is to that franchise: a sequel, and a revisit. Two decades after the defeat of Voldemort, Harry (Jamie Parker, a history boy not long ago) and wife Ginny (Poppy Miller) have settled awkwardly into almost-midlife, he as the Head of Magical Law Enforcement at the Ministry of Magic, and she editing the sports page at The Daily Prophet. Their second son, Albus (Sam Clemmett), if off to Hogwarts, as is Rose (Susan Heyward), the daughter of Ron Weasley (Paul Thornley) and Hermione Granger (Noma Dumezweni). To the surprise of all, Albus is “sorted” into the foreboding Slytherin House; even more surprising, Albus finds a bestie in the unlikely person of Scorpius Malfoy (Anthony Boyle), unlikely given Harry’s complicated history with his father, Draco (Alex Price). The family conflicts prod the new students to use the dangerous Time Turner to reverse one of the more traumatic events in Harry Potterdom–which inevitably creates new problems that could very well lead to the resurrection of the dread Lord Voldemort.

“He Who Must Not Be Named” and Severus Snape appear in the show, both courtesy of the great Broadway veteran Byron Jennings, who adds Uncle Vernon for a triple threat. Main Stem familiars Kathryn Meisle and Geraldine Hughes are also in a cast big enough for the Lyric. But the heaviest lifting is done by the West End imports, who have relocated to a space beautifully (and, for some, hazardously) reupholstered for the spectacle. The weight of the storied past hangs heavily over the adults, stifling Ron and Hermione’s marriage and disrupting Harry’s relationship with his eager-to-please, yet troubled, son. The most intriguing idea in the densely plotted saga is that the bond formed by the trio in their youth crowds out everything else in their adult lives, and Parker, Thornley, and in particular Dumezweni show the interlocking joys and tensions that have accumulated over the years. The show is all but stolen, however, by Boyle, in a delightfully multifaceted performance as the awkwardly tormented Scorpius, struggling in Draco’s shadow, and uncovering his own shadows as he sloughs it off.

Stay for the involved storyline and the fine acting–but you’ve (also) come for the stage magic, and Harry delivers. The live-action sleight of hand differentiates itself immediately from the CGI-laden movies, with many of the environments conjured by movement director Steven Hoggett, who over the last decade has made himself invaluable here and abroad with his balletic choreography of actors. Despite the pricetag a less-is-more approach has been adopted, with music (Imogen Heap), lighting (Neil Austin), sound (Gareth Fry), and set (Christine Jones) design consistently underplaying the mythology and saving “the good stuff” for key moments. Illusion and magic consultant Jamie Harrison has quite a bag of tricks in store, however, and while I won’t spoil anything let’s say the Dementors have never been quite so demented as they are here. A factor in Broadway’s biggest-grossing season to date, Harry Potter and the Cursed Child is nominated for ten Tony Awards, and is likely to fly off with a few on Sunday. My journey through Potterworld ended on a fully satisfying note–then my daughter reminded me that we still have to see the movie tour, in London. This parent may be done with Harry Potter, but Harry Potter isn’t done with me.

Rounding out my 2017-2018 theatre season was the Drama Desk Awards, which made as much lemonade as could be squeezed out of a lemon-y Broadway year, and rightly favored better tidings from Off regarding nominations. But happy to see that SpongeBob SquarePants soaked up a lot of love, with a half-dozen well-earned plaudits.

Popdose Video Premiere: The Red Button featuring Peter Noone, “Ooh Girl”

Popdose is very excited and pleased to present the video for “Ooh Girl”, the new single release from The Red Button, featuring Peter Noone on JEM Records.  It is, undoubtedly, a VERY CHOICE VIDEO and TRACK!

The Red Button, as you probably know by now, is Seth Swirsky and Mike Ruekberg, both singer/songwriters with numerous hits and songwriting credits.  Peter Noone (of course) gained prominence at the age of 15 as the lead singer of the legendary and much-beloved British Invasion group, Herman’s Hermits, and still tours, performing over 120 dates a year. He also hosts “Something Good with Peter Noone” on Sirius/XM radio.

Here’s a staggeringly good piece of pure pop, done – naturally – quite rightly by The Red Balloon with Peter Noone; you’ll quickly understand why we dig it!

www.theredbutton.com

http://www.jemrecordings.com

Sugar Water: My Privacy Policy Has Changed

Hello! Over the past couple weeks you’ve probably received dozens of e-mails from websites about changes to their privacy policies. But your privacy is also important to me, just as I hope mine is important to you, which is why I constantly strive to be as transparent as possible. Please take a moment to familiarize yourself with my updated policy.

INFORMATION I COLLECT:
I record your first and last name. If no last name is forthcoming, and if you happen to be an attractive barista 15-20 years younger than me, I will search online until I find you on Facebook or Instagram. However, if no online presence can be detected, I will return to your place of employment, work up my courage over the course of eight hours, and attempt to engage you as you wipe down tables at closing time. “Hey, have you heard about that Game of Thrones random name generator?” I’ll say. “Here, I’ll do yours since you’re busy and can’t see my laptop screen from way over there. All I need is your last name and your age, because if you’re still in high school we have a problem.”

I also record your birthday and will wish you a happy birthday every year on Facebook, otherwise known as my virtual memory (MVM), by typing “HBD,” an acronym that thoughtfully takes into account your busy social-media life. However, I will not collect your birth year if you opt out of providing me with that information. But seriously, what’s the big deal? We seem to have watched the same TV shows growing up and accidentally memorized the same baseball statistics, so I don’t understand why you’ve always danced around the subject. Do you think I should be keeping my own age private? That I’m only hurting myself at parties when I say things like “Everyone’s heard of Knight Rider, but remember Street Hawk, the one where Rex Smith played a cop who rode a high-tech motorcycle?” Now that I think about it, that’s a really good point. Thank you for sharing that information.

Other data I collect includes photos you’ve posted online from our college years, when anything seemed possible in our to-be-determined adult lives, but not photos you’ve posted from the past five years, a period in which you seem to have accomplished all of your goals while managing to hold onto the same breathtaking smile you had 20 years ago. Honestly, no one needs to be reminded of your natural radiance, and that includes MVM.

Lastly, I will never ask for your Social Security number. That’s because I already know it. I shouldn’t, but you shouldn’t carry your Social Security card in your purse, then leave the purse on my kitchen counter while you use my bathroom. Identity theft is real, and you failed this particular test.

INFORMATION I SHARE:
photoI share gossip with third parties. For example, if you give me any hint of how much money you make, and my internal algorithm concludes that it’s far more than what I make at my non-dream, far-from-a-career job, I’ll casually bring it up in conversation with our mutual friends. But if you never give me a hint and never talk about what you do for a living, I’ll tell those friends, “I bet he’s got a trust fund. Or he’s a drug dealer who doesn’t want to show off, but where’s the fun in that?”

INFORMATION I COLLECT BUT DON’T SHARE:
I read all the “spoilers” for the big-budget comic-book superhero movies, because by the time I finally see Avengers: Infinity War or Deadpool 2 I’ll have forgotten what the spoilers were, just like how I forget everything that happens in those movies less than 24 hours after I’ve watched them, so don’t worry — their secrets are safe with me. (Please note that any spoilers you’ve collected and decide to share about the new Han Solo movie, which I still haven’t seen, will immediately void this section of my privacy policy. No exceptions.)

INFORMATION I’M DYING TO SHARE BUT WON’T:
If you’re a stranger making a FaceTime call on public transportation without the use of earbuds, I’m legally allowed to interrupt your broadcast to acquire the following information: “Whose face is that? What is your relationship with said face? Would you categorize your faces’ shared backstory as ‘complicated’ or, better yet, worthy of its own six-episode ‘limited-event’ cable series?” However, I will refrain from saying anything to your face since I don’t want to be punched in the face, an exchange of information that will be seen by other faces close by and possibly many more faces on Facebook Live if one of the faces close by decides to record it on his or her phone and spread the word to YouTube. An embarrassment like that could lead off Good Morning America on a slow news day. No thanks.

Similarly, I will not share my opinion of the amount of space you take up on public transportation. I would love to ask if your backpack is past its terrible twos and that’s why it no longer has to sit in your lap on the train, but I have no idea what your life is like. (In other words, I haven’t walked a mile in your shoes, but may I suggest something with better arch support than Chuck Taylors?) Maybe you live with your wife and three kids in a one-bedroom, one-bathroom fifth-floor walk-up — you can’t get any space in private, so you’ll take as much as you can get in public. Life is short, so whenever that prerecorded voice on the train casually announces that “Doors are closing,” I start to regret how much time I’ve spent noticing who’s taking up two or more seats. Or gossiping about a frenemy’s income. Or reading movie spoilers when I could be reading books. I sometimes think, Do I read spoilers just so I can pretend like a good friend’s told me a deeply personal secret he knows I’ll keep private no matter what? Maybe if I didn’t gossip so much, I’d have more friends. Maybe if I was more willing to share feelings, not information, I wouldn’t feel so alone.

INFORMATION I’D PREFER YOU NOT SHARE:
Please don’t share the last half of the preceding paragraph — I overshared. Please respect my privacy during this difficult time.

COOKIES:
My cookie policy remains unchanged: I like them. I try to avoid buying them at the grocery store, but if you put one in front of me I won’t refuse it. And if you leave some in the break room at work, I’ll stuff two of the macadamia-nut or M&M kind in my pocket when no one’s looking and walk away without a hint of remorse. Have you noticed how a free cookie can turn your whole day around? It doesn’t even have to be a fancy one. Actually, I do draw the line at the Keebler “soft batch” variety — those are cookie-cutter cookies, if you know what I mean. I’m not a kid anymore. My taste in cookies is more sophisticated now, a morsel of information I’ll be happy to share with attractive baristas 15-20 years younger than me for the considerable future.

Dw. Dunphy On…The John Goodman Problem

Shortly after ABC dropped the hammer on the Roseanne revival, after Roseanne Barr’s offensive tweet concerning Valerie Jarrett (which I’m not adding here – If you don’t know what I’m talking about, I’m sure you can easily Google up some clarification), a prominent celebrity gossip site posted a picture of John Goodman, walking his dog and scowling.

He had every reason to, but before we dig into that, the entire nation, seemingly, took their white or blue dress and their “Yanny” or “Laurel” to the side of their choosing. One said that ABC’s swift and painful cancellation was right. And this was painful for ABC. For the first time in a long time, a network program was rivalling ratings found on cable and online sources, ratings not seen since the days of old. Plus, setting aside the controversies tied to the debut episode of the revival, the show was indeed a quality show, mostly through the steady hands of Whitney Cummings, Wanda Sykes, and the presence of will that was Sara Gilbert. 

Please recall that it was Gilbert’s mini-skit in early-2017 with Goodman on The Talk that reminded people that this series had not only once existed, but struck a chord with audiences. Gilbert was the parent of this revival project, and likely sensing a responsible and daring person was going to be at the helm, Goodman seemed only too happy to get back into Dan Conner’s workboots. It was never the name at the opening of the credits that drove this machine, which probably made things worse, not better. Gilbert was this iteration’s matriarch, not Roseanne, and there’s a possibility that this was a bruise to the ego.

Things to consider: For that other side who jumped to the blue dress/”Laurel” side and argued for the “many, many people who unfairly lost their jobs because of the cancellation,” I reply, yes, because all the other people associated with other shows that were cancelled this month magically get to keep their jobs regardless of the non-operational status of their programs. (Oh, wait…)

If you are a celebrity, you can tweet anything you want at any time with zero repercussions or responsibility to others. Everyone can go on and figuratively open their mouths to drop digital fÆces at any time and get away with it. (Oh, wait…)

Responsibility is more than owning up to a mistake after the fÆces have hit the fan. It is recognizing that you have certain powers at hand, and so you need to wield them wisely and carefully before incidents to keep them from happening. It’s not enough to, paraphrasing Jamie Foxx, “blame it on the a-a-a-a-a-Ambien.”

Whatever. This is not about Roseanne Barr. She came on this show and was, for better or worse, the Roseanne you knew before. Even though Laurie Metcalf is a great actor, only now truly receiving the accolades she’s deserved for years, her work was perfectly in keeping with what she’d previously done with her character Jackie.

But Goodman’s Dan Conner…that’s something else. Rarely has an actor been given a chance to jump back into a character from their past – from a sitcom, no less; from a sitcom where the character died, no less less – and really do something with that opportunity. I haven’t seen much growth from either Will or Grace, to be blunt, and we’ll need to wait to find out if Murphy Brown and company are able to do something worthwhile with this political moment they’ve been handed.

If you have the opportunity to watch this past season of Roseanne, which has now been rendered an incredibly difficult thing to do, focus on Goodman giving the performance of a lifetime. He had taken the character of Dan from loveable, occasionally goofy, hard-working Joe to one feeling the weight of the world on the original run. Now, he’s been able to fully explore how such a degradation of hope and, some might say naivete looks to someone fighting for a dream, only to see it spill out at his feet, the mythological Sisyphus still trying to push that stone up the mountain. Having conquered the empty nest syndrome and graduated to husband, he’s now thrust back into the role of dad (and grand-dad), the breadwinner, the one really thrown by the curve. Sisyphus is getting older, the stone’s getting heavier, and believing is harder than it used to be. 

It’s a performance and a character arc that was deserving of an Emmy nod, and very well could have achieved it, if it wasn’t for one reckless person’s lack of stewardship. That one person could have looked around and seen how remarkable things were, how fortunate, how blessed they were and just rode that wave of critical and public appreciation. That person could have done what so many do on a daily basis, keeping their garbage to themselves like adults, recognizing how good “the greater good” was doing, and then could have decided to explore this fantastic and rare opportunity to be with actors who are excelling in their craft and – oh, wait, got another fÆces-drop for all’a y’all. 

I go back to that picture of John Goodman, walking his dog and scowling. He has every right to. He put everything out there and delivered work that came out of the heart and soul, sure, but also came straight out of his bone marrow. If there is any justice in any of this, he will get nominated for an award for his performance, in spite of this controversy, but probably won’t. You’d scowl too.

Album Review: David Myhr, “Lucky Day”

If David Myhr’s first solo record, Soundshine, was meant to remind you he was a founding member of The Merrymakers, his latest is meant to remind you he’s an excellent songwriter.

That can be a tough thing to accomplish in the very loose amalgamation known as the power-pop genre. Like its aggravated cousin, punk rock, power-pop can get by on its sound, and many artists have. Some have done very well by it, too, but beneath the sunny emotions, the good-time energy, and the snappy beat, some of the actual songwriting can be found lacking.

It’s never been the case for Myhr, who even in his Merrymakers days attempted to make more of his proving ground than some of his peers. He does so again with his new album, Lucky Day, albeit with a few significant shifts. This one is a bit more melancholic than its immediate predecessor, despite the immediate sing-a-long charms of the opening “Jealous Sun,” a track more in keeping with your expectations.

The tonal shift inches in with “My Negative Friend,” which winks and nods towards a McCartney-style confection, as well as the following “Room To Grow.” We arrive at this point of departure with “Every Day It Rains.” It’s still a hopeful, positive sentiment as Myhr is wont to deliver, but there’s an ’70s A.M. radio restraint to it that, possibly, wouldn’t have been in play a few years ago. The same goes for the country-ish title track, a sweetly constructed bit of romance.

Once we’ve crossed that line, tracks like “Lovebug” and the closing “The Only Thing I Really Need Is You” sound perfectly of a piece with the rest of the package. (Please note: the CD has four additional tracks.) In all, Lucky Day is a lovely song cycle from a singer/songwriter with something to prove.

Thus, I have concerns that the audience may not be prepared for it, and I hope my spoilers here can guide you through instead of turning you off. There isn’t an immediate, grab-you-and-shake-you pop anthem on here like Soundshine‘s “Got You Where He Wanted.” Lucky Day‘s tracks are more subtle and require you to meet it halfway, and you should certainly make that effort – it’s not that difficult.

I’ll put it this way: last year, I reviewed Squeeze’s The Knowledge. It took some time for me to get on its wavelength, as Chris Difford and Glenn Tilbrook have matured so far past “Pulling Mussels” and “Hourglass.” I kept missing what I had in the midst of looking for all the bits I hadn’t. The Knowledge, as it turned out, was a fine record.

David Myhr is on a similar trajectory. He still writes songs meant to put a smile on your face, but he’s got a whole other level of sophistication happening here, one that a diehard Merrymakers fan might find as a shock on first listen. Work through your initial reaction and you’ll find he’s just as creative, tuneful and, yes, poppy as ever, but not everything needs to be in bold primary colors. Give David Myhr’s Lucky Day a chance and it will reward you in return.

 

Soul Serenade: Cliff Nobles & Co., “The Horse”

It’s a pretty rare occurrence for a record to be credited to an artist who doesn’t actually appear on it. One example I can think of is “River Deep, Mountain High” which is credited to Ike and Tina Turner despite the fact that producer Phil Spector made sure that Ike was nowhere near the studio when the session for that single was going down. “The Horse” is another example. The record is credited to Cliff Nobles & Co. despite the fact that Cliff Nobles himself doesn’t appear on it.

Cliff Nobles wasn’t one of those artists who took to music as a small child. In fact, it wasn’t until high school in his Alabama hometown that he began his singing career as a member of a vocal group called the Delroys. He must have enjoyed the experience because it wasn’t long after high school that he pursued his dreams of being a singer to Philadelphia. As it turned out, being a big fish in a small pond was a lot easier than being an unknown talent in a big city.

Nobles was able to finagle a record deal with Atlantic and he cut three singles for the label, but none of them went anywhere and he left Philadelphia for the relatively bucolic Norristown, PA, 18 miles from the city. Nobles started singing in a local church and put together a band to play a more secular variety of music. Cliff Nobles & Co. included bass player Benny Williams, lead guitarist Bobby Tucker, and drummer Tommy Soul. The band recorded some demos that eventually made their way to a producer, singer, and songwriter by the name of Jesse James. As luck would have it, James had heard Nobles sing in church and he was already a fan.

Cliff Nobles & Co - "The Horse"

With James on board as a songwriter, Nobles was able to score another record deal, this time with the Phil-L.A. label. The band’s first single for the label did nothing. The second single, however, was the charm … sort of. The A-side of the record was “Love is Alright” but as sometimes happened in those days, DJs turned the record over and the flip-side, “The Horse,” became a huge hit. The thing is, “The Horse” is an instrumental. In fact, it’s the instrumental track for “Love is Alright.” The only thing missing from “The Horse” was Nobles’ voice.

At the end of July 1968, “The Horse” reached the #2 spot on the pop chart. It might have gone to the top but for another instrumental, Hugh Masekela’s “Grazin’ in the Grass,” which was occupying that spot. It was the first time in pop history that two instrumentals sat in the top two positions on the chart in the same week. In any event, “The Horse” sold a million copies in the first three months of its release and won Nobles a Gold Record. It’s interesting to note that the horn section on the record went on to be part of the legendary Philadelphia session group MFSB.

Record companies are not known for their sensitivity to artists’ egos and Phil-L.A. was no exception. Noting the success of the instrumental, the label continued to release singles under the name Cliff Nobles & Co. and Nobles continued not to appear on them. These singles included “Horse Fever” and “Switch it On.” There was an album called, what else, The Horse, but that too was mostly instrumentals. The only time Nobles came close to appearing on a hit was on a later Roulette Records single that nearly cracked the Top 40.

Nobles left the music industry and worked in construction and electricity generation. He remained in Norristown for the rest of his life and died there in 2008. Cliff Nobles will always be a notable figure in music history but not necessarily for the right reasons. He was a good singer and entertainer and one big hit single bore his name but not his voice.

Radio City With Jon Grayson & Rob Ross: Episdode Sixty-Six

Radio City With Jon Grayson & Rob Ross:  Episode Sixty Six

Every now and then, Jon and Rob take the fork in the road without paving – thus, the 66th installment of Radio City… is simply an unscripted conversation between the boys which, naturally, turned out to be another masterpiece of a podcast.  During this week’s show, among the various topics (and there are a lot), they dissect and excoriate Roseanne Barr’s idiocy; the opening of the Stanley Cup Finals; Jon talks about seeing “Solo” on opening weekend; an interesting and informative discussion about the year in music from 1966 (!); plus a chat about food (something new); Peter Holsapple’s upcoming solo album, The Co-op Communique – Volume 4’s release on June 1st and an unplanned “In Our Heads” – you are NOT going to want to miss this one.

As they’re wont to say, “this is why we do this show”.  And this is why you want them doing it; you need them doing it.  Because it’s a moment of clarity and relief for all of us.

Radio City With Jon Grayson & Rob Ross:  Episode Sixty Six


The podcast will be on the site as well as for subscription via iTunes and other podcast aggregators. Subscribe and let people know about Radio City, as well as Popdose’s other great podcasts David Medsker’s Dizzy Heights and In:Sound with Michael Parr and Zack Stiegler.

There’s Only One Outcome Where We Win: “Avengers: Infinity War” and the Problem With the Marvel Cinematic Universe

I remember when Iron Man was released in 2008. At the time, Everyone considered it a mad experiment. Tony Stark was not someone known to a large audience and Robert Downey Jr was considered a has been who wasn’t an actor so much as a pharmaceutical waste dispensary. And, even though superhero movies had been commercially and artistically successful, (like most of Sam Raimi’s Spider-man trilogy and Batman Begins) Marvel was using this B-list drunken superhero to launch a new franchise that would require an audience that watches only a few films a year to watch twelve films just so the massive crossovers would make sense.

But I saw Iron Man (at the midnight release, no less) and was greatly impressed. Downey Jr. did a perfect job encapsulating a man cut off to the world who slowly realizes the wreckage he’s leaving behind. There was a reason for Stark to become a super hero and a reason for him to fight the bad guy. It was a masterfully made movie that I still point out as one of the best examples of the genre.

And then the post credits sequence played and lead to sustained cheering in the theater. There was a sense of excitement about new entries. Finally, comic book fans had the chance to see not just the mainstream characters, but any character come to the screen.

Besides, it’s possible to build a cinematic universe. Indie Gen X darling turned professional podcaster Kevin Smith did so in the ‘90s. Each of his films stand alone, but there are hints at the larger world just outside the frame. Characters between films are relatives; Randall from Clerks and Brody from Mallrats are cousins, although you only learn this if you really pay attention to the dialogue. Certain locations and items show up between films. Even characters from other films make brief appearances in later entries. But I never felt Smith only wanted to advertise whatever he was working on next. I also didn’t feel like I had to watch each film to understand the larger plot.

Ten years later, I went to see Avengers: Infinity Wars and my attitude around Marvel movies had changed. Instead of looking forward to them, I came to dread each impending release. I felt I had to see them more out of obligation than desire, because everyone on the planet would be talking about it for the rest of the year.

Pretty much immediately after Iron Man, the movies started making the same mistakes the comic books have been making for decades. Individual comic stories, even the ones featuring superheroes, can be very effective pieces of writing and are sometimes better than mainstream novels. But they must have an opening and a definitive ending. They must have proper emotional stakes. They must embrace their medium and must be self-contained. It’s fine if you make in-jokes about other characters, but don’t make those jokes necessary to understand the entire story.

But most comic series can’t those things due to editorial pressure. The stories can’t have an ending, because the series can never properly end. Death is temporary and is dependent and the deaths that may make the greatest emotional impact with readers also would involve the most profitable characters. And writers aren’t allowed to interpret the characters or inject anything that may cause controversy. They take over the status quo and must maintain it.

Each of those flaws is present in the Marvel Cinematic Universe films. Filmmakers like Edgar Wright and Joss Whedon have walked away from projects because they would not get any editorial control. Age of Ultron contained unnecessary and bizarre scenes that had nothing to do with the narrative. Only later did we find out these scenes were meant to be teasers for whatever Thor sequel was about to come out. Each film must advertise the next installment in the story, meaning that it’s impossible for them to stand on their own merits. And any death in a Marvel movie is not likely to stick. There are exceptions (like Yondu in Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2) but Avengers: Infinity War asks me to care about the death of characters who have already been confirmed to appear in upcoming films.

And to add to everything, Infinity War only showed me half a movie. Splitting something into two parts was a marketing trope I thought we were past, but Marvel brought it back with a vengeance.

I should pause to say that I didn’t think that Infinity War was a bad movie on its own, necessarily. The plot is straightforward, about a cosmic villain Thanos (Josh Brolin) trying to gather all the magical infinity stones that allow the wielders to reshape reality. He wants to destroy half the universe and the heroes rather wish he wouldn’t. What follows is a sort of greatest hits montage between all the different Marvel film characters (except Ant Man) and all the greatest locations.

I admire how it pre-emptively responded to all my criticisms. I was concerned that, given the sheer amount of characters in the film, I would be unable to follow what was happening. But that didn’t happen, because the movie didn’t depend too much on the past. Additionally, the filmmakers knew how to use the characters properly. Doctor Strange and the Guardians of the Galaxy are utilized the most, which makes sense given the cosmic scale of this fight. We also get a nice visit to Wakanda in the third act for the final battle. And I liked how they tried to add some depth to Thanos, who had only been briefly glimpsed in the past films. I understood why he felt what he was doing was morally right, even if it was horrifying.

But then it was all ruined by the ending, which doesn’t exist. The anvil has been dropped and the heroes are at the lowest points they could possibly be. Then, the film abruptly stops right as the emotional stakes couldn’t possibly get any higher and I realized I’d been conned.  I left disappointed, knowing that I was essentially shown a massive trailer for the next Avengers film.

“But there have been films that end on cliffhangers and have dangling plot lines! What about The Empire Strikes Back?” I hear you cry. Well, Empire was a standalone film that wrapped up the story it wanted to tell. Yes, it left some dangling plot threads for the next installment, but the characters went through the arc they needed to go through. Luke realized that, even as a Jedi, he was not all powerful and could still fail to protect his friends. Leia realized how she was torn between settling down for what she wanted or continuing to fight for the greater good. Han realized that eventually his past was going to catch up to him and hurt the people who loved him. Lando realized that he couldn’t stay isolated from the galaxy. It was a dark moment that required further exploration, but each character came away with something they didn’t have at the beginning. And that was decidedly not the case with Infinity War, with the exception of the villain. Imagine if Empire “ended” right as C3P0 was shot by the stormtroopers at Bespin or as Han, Leia, and Lando opened the door to find Darth Vader waiting for them. You’d likely be mad, wondering if the film was missing a few reels or if the theater lost power. Yet that’s pretty much what Infinity War did.

Yet I couldn’t even have that conversation with anyone. Giving anything that may be considered a spoiler is a cardinal sin in today’s world, in case someone somewhere didn’t see the film. And this whole obsession with spoilers is just another way to stifle any commentary on the films that could inform audiences about what they can expect. I’d have loved to talk about the “ending” far sooner, but I could practically feel the scarlet “A” being sewn to my clothes every time I even thought about discussing that terrible “ending.”

Overall, I’m just frustrated. Marvel films have become the template that everyone is trying to emulate, which is just compounding the mistake. Marvel film releases have become an assembly line process where every movie exists to promote the next one. I guess it’s honest – that’s the same way comic book series have been churning out issues since the Golden Age. But that’s not what I want in a film. I want something that exists because the creators are passionate about the characters and want to tell their own version of the classic superhero story. Avengers Infinity War didn’t do that. It merely exists to set up everything for the next film. How should I feel about watching a nearly three-hour commercial?